Workstation Logo
Products
AI LabsOpenAI AgentsCRMMarketingAll Products
AI Solutions
AI WorkstationsAI SME PackagesPrivate AIGPU ClustersEdge AIEnterprise AI LabAI by Industry
Services
Platform ModernisationDigital EngineeringData Foundations & AIAutonomous OperationsAI ConsultancyDevOps AutomationCyber SecuritySoftware DevelopmentAgent BuildingMLOps Setup
About Us
PartnersCustomer Stories
Articles
Documentation
WSL ProxyRing Promoter
Blog
Contact UsLogin
Workstation

AI workstations, AI Multi Agentic Software, GPU infrastructure, and intelligent agent solutions for modern businesses.

UK Office: 77-79 Marlowes, Hemel Hempstead HP1 1LF - Directions - Take Junction 20 off M25 Outer London
Company No: 11641870
Mon - Fri: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM GMT
+44 7515 356 146

Belgium Office: Workstation SRL, Rue Vanderkindere 34, 1180 Uccle, Brussels
BE 0751.518.683
Mon - Fri: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM CET
+32 492 45 67 46

India Office: #159 Sector 9, Pocket 1, DDA Flats, 110077 Dwarka, New Delhi
+91 98881 98841

Products

All ProductsWSL ProxyRing PromoterAI LabsOpenAI Agents

AI Solutions

AI SolutionsAI WorkstationsPrivate AIGPU ClustersEnterprise AI LabServices

Resources

ArticlesDocumentationBlogSearch

Company

About UsPartnersContact

© 2026 Workstation AI. All rights reserved.

PrivacyCookies

Loading blog...

Home / Blog
AnthropicAILLMCodingFinOps

Claude Models Compared: Haiku vs Sonnet vs Opus vs Fable 5 (Mythos 5)

A quick guide to choosing the right Claude model tier, plus a cheap-to-frontier router.

Balinder WaliaJuly 8, 20263 min read

A quick, practical guide to Claude model tiers. For the full deep-dive with routing blueprints, prompting patterns, and a token-budget playbook, read the large article.

Claude models comparison: Haiku, Sonnet, Opus, Fable 5, Mythos 5

The one-paragraph version. Claude model selection is mostly a trade between latency, cost, and how long the task needs the model to stay in the flow. Use claude-haiku-4-5 for fast and cheap intent work, claude-sonnet-5 for the best speed/quality balance, claude-opus-4-8 for complex agentic coding and enterprise work, and reserve claude-fable-5 (and gated claude-mythos-5) for the truly hard, long-horizon jobs that take hours or days.

Model lineup at a glance

Model Best for Context window Max output Pricing (input / output) Thinking behavior
Claude Fable 5 (claude-fable-5) Long-running agents and hardest unsolved problems 1M tokens 128K tokens $10 / $50 per MTok Adaptive thinking always on
Claude Opus 4.8 (claude-opus-4-8) Complex agentic coding and enterprise work 1M tokens 128K tokens $5 / $25 per MTok Adaptive thinking always on
Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5) Best speed/quality balance 1M tokens 128K tokens $3 / $15 per MTok Adaptive thinking always on
Claude Haiku 4.5 (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001) Fastest model for cheap, high-volume tasks 200K tokens 64K tokens $1 / $5 per MTok Extended thinking available (adaptive off)

Claude Mythos 5 (claude-mythos-5) is a gated model that shares the same specs and pricing as Fable 5, but does not include the safety classifiers used by Fable 5. Availability is limited to approved partners via Project Glasswing.

Pick the right model (quick rules)

  • Haiku 4.5: routing, classification, extraction, and any workflow where you want fast replies and you cannot afford high output-token budgets.
  • Sonnet 5: daily coding and document work where you want strong quality without Opus/Fable pricing.
  • Opus 4.8: complex agentic coding, enterprise analysis, and harder debugging where longer, more autonomous work is required.
  • Fable 5: the hard, long-horizon problems that take hours or days, especially when the model must keep the goal, delegate sub-tasks, and stay coherent.

Effort and thinking: how it impacts cost

On the API, effort is the primary control for the trade-off between intelligence, latency, and cost on Fable 5 and Mythos 5. For Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 5, you can also set effort explicitly when you need a different cost/latency profile.

Practical implication: defaulting every request to maximum effort is usually the fastest way to spend your budget on output tokens.

Token strategy that works across all tiers

Claude output tokens are the expensive part. A simple rule is: cap output length, prompt for TLDR-first, and use prompt caching so stable prefixes (system instructions and tool schemas) are reused.

  • Use the cheapest model that can finish. A router (Haiku -> Sonnet/Opus -> Fable) often cuts cost dramatically while keeping quality high.
  • Set output limits. In production, always set a max output / token cap. Unbounded answers are a budgeting accident.
  • Use summaries strategically. Instead of sending full transcripts every turn, keep a compact “lessons” memory and only update it.

A simple router blueprint

  1. Classify intent and estimated complexity with claude-haiku-4-5.
  2. Send “normal hard” work to claude-sonnet-5 (or claude-opus-4-8 when you expect heavier agentic coding).
  3. Escalate to claude-fable-5 only when the task is clearly long-horizon or has failed on lower tiers.
  4. If Fable 5 refuses via safety classifiers, fall back to Opus 4.8 (the API supports refiring with fallbacks when configured).

Further reading (official)

  • Models overview
  • Introducing Fable 5 and Mythos 5
  • Prompting Claude Fable 5